Google Chrome Frame is Good News

This week, Google released the first public version of Google Chrome Frame. This is “an early-stage open source plug-in that seamlessly brings Google Chrome’s open web technologies and speedy JavaScript engine to Internet Explorer.” In ordinary-speak, it lets crappy old versions of Internet Explorer – which many folks still use for one reason or another – work nearly as well as modern browsers like Apple’s Safari and Google Chrome. This is very exciting indeed.

It means that it might be possible, in the near future, for us to design all of our sites to require this, and not have to worry about the many, many problems with old versions of IE. We will be able to spend more time doing design, and less time worrying about technical issues.

Thank you, Google.

Meet Your Host

But let’s take a step back, and consider what it means for Needmore to recommend a host to our clients.

image

(That’s your ideal host, there.)

For one thing, speed matters. The difference between a website that loads instantly (like google.com) and a page that takes just one second to load has a huge psychological impact on how visitors perceive your site and your brand. It’s not difficult to imagine that a slow site might be seen as less attractive than a fast one.

For another thing, software support makes a huge difference. Very few web hosts are actually capable of supporting modern software like the Magento e-commerce system, much less with the level of speed and performance we require. Few list whether or not they meet its requirements at all, in which case it might just be a lot of work to even figure out if it’s possible.

We spend a great deal of time evaluating different hosting companies. We’re well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of numerous such companies, and we constantly adjust our expectations accordingly. One bad referral can really sour a relationship with a client. So we take great pains to make the best recommendations we’re able to.

Hosting is so important, in fact, that we have started offering our own plans for some of our projects, exclusively to our clients, that we know will work best. Design is our first love, not web hosting, but we’re willing to do it because it’s just that important.

So for another hosting company to contact us out of the blue is very interesting. They seem like a great company, but they’ve got a lot to prove. The only way that we could recommend them to our clients is if we were to try them out first. So if I were them, and I were reaching out to designers trying to get their business, I would offer something for free. Like hosting.

I would simple offer to set the designer up with my best hosting plan for a reasonable amount of time (why not just a year?) to evaluate it. In this case, a hosting company could look at this as a loss of $250, since that’s what they could potentially mean for them in terms of income. But we all know it’s not that simple.

Let’s say we decide we like a hosting company, and start recommending clients to them. Let’s further assume that we refer just one client per month, for three years, and the average client stays with them for three years. If I’m doing my math right, that’s $27,000. All this potential, potentially costing them next to nothing, for giving out a free sample.

Andaluz Waterbirth

image

We’ve just collaborated with Andaluz Waterbirth Center here in Portland to redesign their website. The website focuses on stunning photography taken at the center, is based on designs by owners Jennifer and Fernando (with a touch of Needmore fit’n’finish), and is easily updatable. We were excited about the opportunity to work with Andaluz as we’ve spent much time in their Portland center; our daughter Zoë was born at Andaluz in April of this year.

Anson Mills Newsletter

We’ve just worked with the folks at Anson Mills to produce their Late Summer Newsletter. During the process, we were struck by the sheer amount of love put into each and every one of their newsletters. For this production, not only did Anson Mills launch two new products, but owner Kay perfected a number of new recipes. We’re so curious about Grits Praline Ice Cream and our mouths are watering over their Neapolitan Style Pizza. You’ve got to give these delights a try.

Project: Gone Vegan

When Gone Raw was first created, it was a project to learn more about the Ruby on Rails framework, specifically. It seemed like the best tool for the job, so I wrote it by myself, for the most part. It was very interesting as an experience, and I was extremely proud when it took off, but almost immediately after that we started having some problems.

It frankly didn’t run that well. I probably wrote some pretty sloppy code, but regardless of the reasons, it was hard to keep the site up. At first, we ran it on a “free” hosting plan we have which is actually quite good, but it couldn’t handle it. So we moved to Slicehost, but that finally couldn’t handle it either. And sadly, the site wasn’t that popular! Certainly not deserving of so many issues. Something had to be done.

That “something” was moving the site into Drupal. Drupal is a web framework as well, but one that’s much more complete. You could certainly build a site without writing any code in Drupal, but there is a lot of work involved – particularly if you have a bunch of legacy data you have to get from one system into another, completely different, system. That can be a problem, and I’m not very skilled at it so we subcontracted another party to do it. Unfortunately, since I was not very knowledgeable about Drupal at that time, I may have provided poor guidance, or else I did not fully understand the criteria for success. Long story short, the data didn’t come across very smoothly. We had issues.

This was just over a year ago, and the site has mostly recovered. People have forgiven me for the awkwardness of that transition, and I have certainly learned a lot from my decisions about it. For a while, I refused to do any projects at all in Drupal, having that and several other fairly poor experiences with it. I’d been burned, and decided to stick to WordPress for a while.

Going to WordPress was also a blessing. I started to develop some of our sites using frameworks like Thematic, and I was extremely happy to have so much of my work done for me. To take a small example, in many “frameworks” for WordPress, you as a web designer are provided with a ton of “body classes.” This lets you know exactly what page someone is looking at, and change the look and feel of any item on any page, with extreme precision. Once you get used to having so many helpful body classes on your pages, you become frustrated with a system (like Drupal, by default) which gives you only a few.

But as we evaluated and decided on an approach for Gone Vegan, we realized that Drupal really was the best platform for the site. Nothing else that we were familiar with came close. And since it has such a thriving community, I was able to track down several modules I’d never encountered before, that added the functionality to Drupal that I needed.

All was right in the world.

image

Gone Vegan was a project that took us one week. Now, that doesn’t mean that we’re done; quite the contrary. A website like this requires ongoing work, no doubt about it. But having worked on Gone Raw for three years, we know what we’re getting into. And of course, we know how to avoid the mistakes that waste time, this time around. And we’re feeling good about it. It’s nice to at least walk into a project with that good feeling. Let’s hope it sticks.

At the very least, making a vegan recipe sharing site has gotten us to eat healthier. Needless to say, having read this far we’d love you to actually visit the site, and let us know what you think. We are, of course, always looking to improve.

Gone Raw Today

Remember when we started Gone Raw? It seem like just yesterday that we were lamenting the lack of resources for raw, vegan recipes. Well, our little website has been steadily growing over the last couple years with over 1,500 users and over 4,000 recipes. And, folks appear to be having a good time on the site, too.

Really awesome job with this site. Thank you. I was really surprised to find such a useful, well-designed site for raw vegan recipes, of all niches. This is, honestly, the first recipe site I’ve ever *enjoyed using*. Looks like there’s a great community here as well. (source)

We’d love to have you stop by and try a recipe or two, check us out on Twitter, or subscribe to our recipe RSS.

My QuickTime X is Broken!

I’ve always been a fan of QuickTime for no other reason than I really like the interface. It’s simple, it’s essentially the ultimate video player. In its latest incarnation, in Snow Leopard, every bit of window disappears when your mouse is gone. The navigation, the title bar, everything. It’s kind of slick, and once you start using it, it makes a lot of sense. It was one of those essential Mac pieces of equipment, so much so that you kind of took it for granted.

image

For as long as I can remember, there has been an option—disabled by default—to set the software to automatically play any media file that it opened. In the preferences, you could even tell it how to handle conflicts in this scenario. For instance, if you opened five MP3 files at once, you could tell it to play them all at the same time, or you could tell it to play only the most recently opened file. It was simple, but flexible, and I had no other cause for complaint other than the paucity of media files that it supported.

This has all changed with QuickTime X in Snow Leopard.

“Seriously, Apple, no autoplay in QuickTime X? I double-click on a media file… do you not think I mean for it to play?!?”

QuickTime X not only has no way to change that setting… it doesn’t have preferences! That’s right, in an ultimate form of pure Apple-ness, they’ve taken out the preferences completely. My trusty command-comma produces nothing at all. But this makes no sense to me at all. I don’t honestly know why the default would be otherwise. Doesn’t everyone who double-clicks on a media file want to watch and/or listen to it? Am I missing something here?

Maybe it’s a bad time that Apple’s QuickTime section of their website still links to – and offers for $29 – the old QuickTime 7 Pro. Maybe they know something we don’t. Maybe Apple fully realizes that the new QuickTime is great, but not ready for prime time yet. Heck, maybe they plan to fix the icon. It looks weird to me.